Project 2025
PurposePlan to reshape the U.S. federal government to support the agenda of Donald Trump
Location
Director
Paul Dans
Budget
$22 million[1]
Websitewww.project2025.org

Project 2025 is a plan to reshape the executive branch of the United States federal government in the event of a Republican victory in the 2024 United States presidential election.[2][3] Established in 2022, the project seeks to recruit tens of thousands of conservatives to Washington, D.C. to replace existing federal civil service workers it characterizes as the "deep state," to further the objectives of the next Republican president.[4] Participants in the project cannot promote a specific presidential candidate, but many have close ties to Donald Trump.[5] The plan would perform a swift takeover of the entire executive branch under a maximalist version of the unitary executive theory — a theory proposing the president of the United States has absolute power of the executive branch — upon inauguration.[6]

The development of the plan is led by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative U.S. think tank, in collaboration with some eighty partners including Turning Point USA led by Charlie Kirk; the Conservative Partnership Institute including former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows as senior partner; the Center for Renewing America led by former Trump OMB director Russell Vought; and America First Legal led by former Trump senior advisor Stephen Miller.[7][8][9] It envisions widespread changes across the entire government, particularly with regard to economic and social policy and the role of the federal government and federal agencies. The project proposes slashing Justice Department funding, dismantling the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, and eliminating the cabinet departments of education and commerce.[10] Citing an anonymous source, The Washington Post reported Project 2025 includes immediately invoking the Insurrection Act to deploy the military for domestic law enforcement and directing the Justice Department to pursue Trump adversaries.[11]

Project 2025 consists largely of a book of policy recommendations titled Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise and an accompanying personnel database open for submissions. There is also an online course called the Presidential Administration Academy, and a guide to developing transition plans.

Background

Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, established Project 2025.

The Heritage Foundation has published new editions in its Mandate for Leadership series coinciding with each presidential election since 1981.[12] Mandate for Leadership: A Conservative Promise is the ninth report in the series and was published in April 2023, earlier than any past releases. Heritage refers to the publication as a "policy bible".[12]

Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts established Project 2025 in 2022 to provide the 2024 Republican Party presidential nominee with a personnel database and ideological framework[13] after civil servants refused to support Trump during his attempt to institute a Muslim travel ban, effort to install a new attorney general to assist him in attempting to overturn the 2020 election, and when he called for lethal force against George Floyd protestors.[14] In April 2023, the Heritage Foundation published a 920-page blueprint written by hundreds of conservatives,[15] most prominently former Trump administration officials.[6]

Nearly half of the project's collaborating organizations have received dark money contributions from a network of fundraising groups linked to Leonard Leo, a major conservative donor and key figure in guiding the selection of Trump's federal judge nominees.[16]

Advisory board and leadership

Project 2025's advisory board consists of "a broad coalition of over 80 conservative organizations" — mainly conservative think tanks, as well as several universities and the magazine The American Conservative.[17]

Notable authors of the project's Mandate for Leadership include many officials and advisors from the Trump administration, including Jonathan Berry; Ben Carson; Ken Cuccinelli; Rick Dearborn; Thomas Gilman; Mandy Gunasekara; Gene Hamilton; Christopher Miller; Bernard McNamee; Stephen Moore; Mora Namdar; Peter Navarro; William Perry Pendley; Diana Furchtgott-Roth; Kiron Skinner; Roger Severino; Hans von Spakovsky; Brooks Tucker; Russell Vought; and Paul Winfree.[18]

Project 2025 Advisory Board members

Overview

In the Mandate's foreword, Kevin Roberts writes:

The long march of cultural Marxism through our institutions has come to pass. The federal government is a behemoth, weaponized against American citizens and conservative values, with freedom and liberty under siege as never before."[19]

Project 2025's director is Paul Dans, who served as chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management during the Trump administration. Spencer Chretien, a former special assistant to Trump, serves as associate director.[20]

Dans, also an editor of the project's guiding document, explains that Project 2025 is "built on four pillars": Pillar I, a 30-chapter, 920-page book called Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise which presents "a consensus view of how major federal agencies must be governed"; Pillar II, a personnel database to "be collated and shared with the President-elect's team", open to the public for submissions; Pillar III, an "online educational system" called the Presidential Administration Academy; and Pillar IV, a "playbook" designed for "forming agency teams and drafting transition plans to move out upon the President's utterance of 'so help me God.'"[21]

In November 2023, Trump made a similar proposal to create a federally funded "American Academy" that would deliver online courses and grant free degrees that excluded "wokeness or jihadism." The plan would also be funded by taxing the endowments of major universities which he asserted were "turning our students into communists and terrorists and sympathizers of many, many different dimensions."[22]

Axios reported that while Heritage had briefed other 2024 Republican presidential candidates on the project, it is "undeniably a Trump-driven operation," noting the involvement of Trump's "most fervent internal loyalty enforcer" Johnny McEntee as a senior advisor to the project. The Trump campaign said no outside group speaks for the former president, referring to its "Agenda47" as the only official plan for a second Trump presidency.[23] Two top Trump campaign officials later issued a statement seeking to distance the campaign from what unspecified outside groups were planning, though many of those plans reflected Trump's own words. The New York Times reported the statement "noticeably stopped short of disavowing the groups and seemed merely intended to discourage them from speaking to the press."[24]

While the project cannot explicitly promote him, Trump's campaign rhetoric has reflected its broad themes. He has stated, "If I happen to be president and I see somebody who's doing well and beating me very badly, I say go down and indict them" and that he would fire "radical Marxist prosecutors that are destroying America." He has said he would "totally obliterate the Deep State" and appoint "a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the United States of America, Joe Biden, and the entire Biden crime family."[25]

Abortion and reproductive rights

In Project 2025's manifesto, Roger Severino writes that the FDA is "ethically and legally obliged to revisit and withdraw its initial approval" of mifepristone and misoprostol.[21] He also recommends that the CDC "update its public messaging about the unsurpassed effectiveness of modern fertility awareness-based methods" of contraception.[21]

Severino says that HHS should require that "every state report exactly how many abortions take place within its borders, at what gestational age of the child, for what reason, the mother's state of residence, and by what method".[21]

Census citizenship question

The project seeks to revive a Trump administration effort to include a question of whether an individual counted in the decennial Census is a U.S. citizen. The census population count is used to reapportion congressional seats and the Electoral College. The Trump administration publicly argued it wanted the new question to prevent racial and language discrimination under the Voting Rights Act, an argument the Supreme Court found to be contrived in rejecting the question for the 2020 Census. The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution states the congressional apportionment figures must include the "whole number of persons in each state," rather than citizens.[26][27]

Climate policy

Project 2025 does not provide strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions responsible for climate change; Heritage Foundation energy and climate director Diana Furchtgott-Roth has suggested Americans should use more natural gas (methane), an allegedly cleaner-burning fossil fuel. Project 2025's blueprint includes repealing the Inflation Reduction Act (a landmark law that offers US$370 billion for clean technology), shuttering the Loan Programs Office at the Department of Energy, eliminating climate change from the National Security Council agenda, and encouraging allied nations to use fossil fuels. The blueprint supports Arctic drilling and declaring that the federal government has an "obligation to develop vast oil and gas and coal resources". Project 2025 would reverse a 2009 finding from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that determined that carbon dioxide emissions are harmful to human health, preventing the federal government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. The climate section of the report was written by several authors, including Mandy Gunasekara, the former chief of staff of the EPA who considers herself principal to the United States's withdrawal from the 2015 Paris Agreement. The role of the Department of Energy was drafted by Bernard McNamee, who has advised several fossil fuel companies. Four of the top authors of the report have publicly engaged in climate change denial.[28]

Expansion of presidential powers

Project 2025 seeks to place the entire Executive Branch of the U.S. federal government under direct presidential control, eliminating the independence of the Department of Justice, Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission, and other agencies.[6] The plan bases its presidential agenda on a maximalist version of the unitary executive theory, arguing that Article Two of the United States Constitution vests executive power solely in the president.[13] While Trump is not the first president to consider policies related to unitary executive theory,[29][30] the idea has seen a resurgence and popularization within the Republican party following the 9/11 terrorist attacks in 2001.[31] Trump, the front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, stated in 2019 that Article Two of the United States Constitution granted him the "right to do whatever as president", a common claim made by supporters of unitary executive theory. A similar remark was echoed in 2018 when he claimed he could fire special counsel Robert Mueller.[13]

In November 2023, The Washington Post reported that deploying the military for domestic law enforcement under the Insurrection Act would be an "immediate priority" upon a second Trump inauguration in 2025. That aspect of the plan was being led by Jeffrey Clark, a Trump co-defendant in the Georgia election racketeering prosecution and an unnamed co-conspirator in the federal prosecution of Trump for alleged election obstruction. Clark is a senior fellow at the Center for Renewing America, a Project 2025 partner.[32] The plan also includes directing the Justice Department to pursue those Trump considers disloyal or political adversaries. After the Post story was published online, a Heritage spokesman said there were no plans related to the Insurrection Act or targeting of political enemies within Project 2025.[11][33]

Throughout the project document, unspecified federal workers at the DOJ, EPA, and USAID are described as "radical Left ideologues" and "activists" who are "embedded" in their departments.[21]

LGBTQ+ rights

When discussing the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Roger Severino, the Heritage Foundation's vice-president on domestic policy, called for the rescinding of regulations "prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, transgender status, sex characteristics, etc."[34]

Outlawing pornography

Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts, in the foreword of Project 2025's manifesto, writes that:[34]

Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.[21]

— "A Promise to America", Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, Project 2025

Personnel

Project 2025 established a personnel database shaped by the ideology of Donald Trump. The project uses a questionnaire to screen potential recruits for their adherence to the project's agenda.[35] Throughout his presidency, Trump was accused of removing individuals whom he considered disloyal regardless of their ideological conviction, such as former attorney general William Barr. In the final year of Trump's presidency, White House Presidential Personnel Office employees James Bacon and John McEntee developed a questionnaire to test potential government employees on their commitment to Trumpism; Bacon and McEntee joined the project in May 2023.[36]

Project 2025 is aligned with Trump's plans to fire more government employees than allocated to the president using Schedule F, a job classification established by Trump in an executive order in July 2020. Although the classification was rescinded by Joe Biden in January 2021, Trump has previously stated that he intends to restore it. The Heritage Foundation plans on having 20,000 personnel in its database by the end of 2024.[13] Russell Vought, a former Trump administration official who heads the Center for Renewing America, stated that the project's goal of removing federal workers would be "a wrecking ball for the administrative state".[37]

Reactions

Former deputy attorney general Donald Ayer said:

Project 2025 seems to be full of a whole array of ideas that are designed to let Donald Trump function as a dictator, by completely eviscerating many of the restraints built into our system. He really wants to destroy any notion of a rule of law in this country ... The reports about Donald Trump's Project 2025 suggest that he is now preparing to do a bunch of things totally contrary to the basic values we have always lived by. If Trump were to be elected and implement some of the ideas he is apparently considering, no one in this country would be safe.[38]

Former Justice Department inspector general Michael Bromwich remarked:

The plans being developed by members of Trump's cult to turn the DOJ and FBI into instruments of his revenge should send shivers down the spine of anyone who cares about the rule of law. Trump and rightwing media have planted in fertile soil the seed that the current Department of Justice has been politicized, and the myth has flourished. Their attempts to undermine DOJ and the FBI are among the most destructive campaigns they have conducted.[39]

Max Stier of the Partnership for Public Service and others voiced concern that the project would revive the early-American spoils-and-patronage system that awarded government jobs to those loyal to a party or elected official, rather than on the basis of merit. The Pendleton Act of 1883 mandated that federal jobs be awarded on merit.[40]

Former Trump campaign and presidency senior advisor Steve Bannon has advocated the plan on his "War Room" podcast, hosting Jeffrey Clark and others working on the project.[41]

Georgetown University public policy professor Donald Moynihan wrote that Schedule F would demand the loyalty of public officials to the president, in conflict with their constitutional obligation to swear a loyalty oath to the Constitution.[42]

Peter Shane, a law professor who writes about the rule of law and the separation of powers, wrote:

The [New York] Times quotes Vought's impatience with conservative lawyers in the first Trump administration who were unwilling to do Trump's bidding without hesitation. Criticizing the timidity of traditional conservative lawyers, Vought told the Times: "The Federalist Society doesn't know what time it is." As for making the Justice Department an instrument of White House political retribution, Vought would unblinkingly jettison the norm of independence that presidents and attorneys general of both parties have carefully nurtured since Watergate. "You don’t need a statutory change at all, you need a mind-set change," Vought told the [Washington] Post. "You need an attorney general and a White House Counsel's Office that don't view themselves as trying to protect the department from the president."[43]

Chauncey DeVega of Salon.com and Spencer Ackerman in The Nation have characterized Project 2025 as a plan to install Trump as a dictator, warning that Trump could prosecute and imprison enemies or overthrow American democracy altogether.[44][45]

Longtime Republican academic Tom Nichols wrote in The Atlantic that Trump "is not bluffing about his plans to jail his opponents and suppress—by force, if necessary—the rights of American citizens."[46]

Writing in Mother Jones, Washington bureau chief David Corn described Project 2025 as "the right-wing infrastructure that is publicly plotting to undermine the checks and balances of our constitutional order and concentrate unprecedented power in the presidency. Its efforts, if successful and coupled with a Trump (or other GOP) victory in 2024, would place the nation on a path to autocracy."[47]

Guthrie Graves-Fitzsimmons, the author of Just Faith: Reclaiming Progressive Christianity, criticized Project 2025 in an MSNBC article for appealing to Christian nationalism. In particular, Graves-Fitzsimmons critiques Roger Severino's chapter on the Department of Health and Human Services and his opposition to the Respect for Marriage Act, a landmark law that repealed the Defense of Marriage Act and codified the federal definition of marriage to recognize same-sex and interracial marriage.[48]

Project 2025 has been criticized by LGBTQ+ writers and journalists for its intended removal of protections for LGBTQ+ people and declarations to outlaw pornography by claiming it as an "omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children".[34] Brynn Tannehill, for Dame magazine, argued that the 902-page document "The Mandate for Leadership" in part "makes eradicating LGBTQ people from public life its top priority", while citing passages from the playbook linking pornography to "transgender ideology", arguing that it related to other anti-transgender attacks in 2023.[49] In September 2023, Ari Drennen, LGBTQ program director for media watchdog group Media Matters for America, tweeted out the passage and similarly argued that "[t]hey’ve put it quite vividly – declare trans content porn, imprison those who make it, put teachers who discuss it on the sex offender registry, and force companies that host it to close."[50][51]

Republican climate advocates have disagreed with Project 2025's climate policy. Joseph Rainey Center for Public Policy president Sarah Hunt considered supporting the Inflation Reduction Act crucial, and Utah representative John Curtis stated it was vital that Republicans "engage in supporting good energy and climate policy". American Conservation Coalition founder Benji Backer noted growing consensus for belief that climate change is human-induced among younger Republicans and called the project wrongheaded.[28]

References

  1. ↑ Swan, Jonathan (December 1, 2023). "Paleoconservative or Moderate? Questions for Staffing the Next G.O.P. White House". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved December 2, 2023.
  2. ↑ Shah, Areeba (September 5, 2023). ""Dark" right-wing network recruits MAGA "army" to replace 50K federal workers Trump plans to purge". Salon. Archived from the original on September 24, 2023. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
  3. ↑ Swan, Jonathan (July 22, 2022). "Inside Trump '25: A radical plan for Trump's second term". Axios. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
  4. ↑ Mascaro, Lisa (August 29, 2023). "Conservative groups draw up plan to dismantle the US government and replace it with Trump's vision". AP News. Archived from the original on September 22, 2023. Retrieved September 21, 2023.
  5. ↑ Doyle, Katherine (November 17, 2023). "Donations have surged to groups linked to conservative Project 2025". NBC News. Archived from the original on November 18, 2023. Retrieved November 18, 2023.
  6. 1 2 3 Swan, Jonathan; Savage, Charlie; Haberman, Maggie (July 17, 2023). "Trump and Allies Forge Plans to Increase Presidential Power in 2025". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 13, 2023. Retrieved November 13, 2023.
  7. ↑ Hirsh, Michael (September 9, 2023). "Inside the Next Republican Revolution". Politico. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved November 6, 2023.
  8. ↑ Jim VandeHei; Mike Allen (November 13, 2023). "Behind the Curtain: Trump allies pre-screen loyalists for unprecedented power grab". Axios. Archived from the original on November 13, 2023. Retrieved November 13, 2023.
  9. ↑ Doyle, Katherine (November 17, 2023). "Donations have surged to groups linked to conservative Project 2025". NBC News. Archived from the original on November 18, 2023. Retrieved November 18, 2023.
  10. ↑ Stone, Peter (November 22, 2023). "'Openly authoritarian campaign': Trump's threats of revenge fuel alarm". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
  11. 1 2 Isaac Arnsdorf; Josh Dawsey; Devlin Barrett (November 5, 2023). "Trump and allies plot revenge, Justice Department control in a second term". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 5, 2023. Retrieved November 5, 2023.
  12. 1 2 "Project 2025 Publishes Comprehensive Policy Guide, 'Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise'". The Heritage Foundation. April 21, 2023. Archived from the original on November 20, 2023. Retrieved November 19, 2023.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Swan, Jonathan; Haberman, Maggie (April 20, 2023). "Heritage Foundation Makes Plans to Staff Next G.O.P. Administration". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 13, 2023. Retrieved September 9, 2023.
  14. ↑ Aleem, Zeeshan (July 17, 2023). "Trump's vision on executive authority is growing more organized and ambitious". MSNBC. Archived from the original on September 12, 2023. Retrieved September 9, 2023.
  15. ↑ Waldman, Scott (July 28, 2023). "Conservatives have already written a climate plan for Trump's second term". Politico. Archived from the original on November 10, 2023. Retrieved November 13, 2023.
  16. ↑ Doyle, Katherine (November 17, 2023). "Donations have surged to groups linked to conservative Project 2025". NBC News. Archived from the original on November 18, 2023. Retrieved November 18, 2023.
  17. ↑ "Advisory Board". Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on November 19, 2023. Retrieved November 19, 2023.
  18. ↑ "Mandate for Leadership". Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on December 1, 2023. Retrieved December 1, 2023.
  19. ↑ Shane, Peter (November 13, 2023). "Blitzkrieg Against the Administrative State". Washington Monthly. Archived from the original on November 20, 2023. Retrieved December 1, 2023.
  20. ↑ "About Project 2025". The Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on November 13, 2023. Retrieved November 13, 2023.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dans, Paul; Groves, Steven, eds. (2023). Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise (PDF). Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation. ISBN 978-0-89195-174-2. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
  22. ↑ Meredith McGraw; Michael Stratford (November 1, 2023). "Trump wants to build a free online university — and make Harvard pay for it". Politico. Archived from the original on November 13, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
  23. ↑ Jim VandeHei; Mike Allen (November 13, 2023). "Behind the Curtain: Trump allies pre-screen loyalists for unprecedented power grab". Axios. Archived from the original on November 13, 2023. Retrieved November 13, 2023.
  24. ↑ Maggie Haberman; Jonathan Swan; Charlie Savage (November 10, 2023). "Trump Campaign Officials Try to Play Down Contentious 2025 Plans". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved November 14, 2023.
  25. ↑ Holmes, Kristen (November 16, 2023). "Trump's radical second-term agenda would wield executive power in unprecedented ways". CNN. Archived from the original on November 19, 2023. Retrieved November 19, 2023.
  26. ↑ Wang, Hansi Lo (October 28, 2023). "A GOP plan for the census would revive Trump's failed push for a citizenship question". National Public Radio. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved November 6, 2023.
  27. ↑ Nina Totenberg; Hansi Lo Wang (June 27, 2019). "Trump Threatens Census Delay After Supreme Court Leaves Citizenship Question Blocked". National Public Radio. Archived from the original on April 4, 2021. Retrieved November 6, 2023.
  28. 1 2 Friedman, Lisa (August 4, 2023). "A Republican 2024 Climate Strategy: More Drilling, Less Clean Energy". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 9, 2023. Retrieved September 9, 2023.
  29. ↑ Barilleaux, Ryan J.; Maxwell, Jewerl (January 2017). "Has Barack Obama Embraced the Unitary Executive?". PS: Political Science & Politics. 50 (1): 31–34. doi:10.1017/S1049096516002055. ISSN 1049-0965. S2CID 157225045. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved September 27, 2023.
  30. ↑ Rozell, Mark; Stollenberger, Mitchell (November 2011). "The Unitary Executive Theory and the Bush Legacy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved September 27, 2023.
  31. ↑ Heer, Jeet (July 21, 2023). "Why Trump 2.0 Would Be Much Worse". ISSN 0027-8378. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved September 27, 2023.
  32. ↑ Stanley-Becker, Isaac (August 3, 2023). "Jeffrey Clark is GOP star after trying to use DOJ to overturn election". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 23, 2023. Retrieved November 29, 2023.
  33. ↑ Jonathan Swan; Charlie Savage; Maggie Haberman (November 1, 2023). "If Trump Wins, His Allies Want Lawyers Who Will Bless a More Radical Agenda". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 5, 2023. Retrieved November 5, 2023.
  34. 1 2 3 Pengelly, Martin (September 15, 2023). "US hard-right policy group condemned for 'dehumanising' anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric". The Guardian. Archived from the original on September 15, 2023. Retrieved September 15, 2023.
  35. ↑ Swan, Jonathan (December 1, 2023). "Paleoconservative or Moderate? Questions for Staffing the Next G.O.P. White House". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved December 2, 2023.
  36. ↑ Samuels, Brett (May 2, 2023). "Ex-Trump aide John McEntee joins Heritage operation as senior adviser". The Hill. Archived from the original on May 31, 2023. Retrieved September 9, 2023.
  37. ↑ Mascaro, Lisa (August 29, 2023). "Conservatives are on a mission to dismantle the US government and replace it with Trump's vision". Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 10, 2023. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  38. ↑ Stone, Peter (November 22, 2023). "'Openly authoritarian campaign': Trump's threats of revenge fuel alarm". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
  39. ↑ Stone, Peter (November 22, 2023). "'Openly authoritarian campaign': Trump's threats of revenge fuel alarm". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
  40. ↑ Berman, Russell (September 24, 2023). "The Open Plot to Dismantle the Federal Government". The Atlantic.
  41. ↑ Stone, Peter (November 22, 2023). "'Openly authoritarian campaign': Trump's threats of revenge fuel alarm". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved November 27, 2023.
  42. ↑ Moynihan, Donald (November 27, 2023). "Trump Has a Master Plan for Destroying the 'Deep State'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved November 27, 2023. The framers included a requirement, in the Constitution itself, that public officials swear an oath of loyalty to the Constitution, a reminder to public employees that their deepest loyalty is to something greater than whoever occupies the White House or Congress. By using Schedule F to demand personal loyalty, Mr. Trump would make it harder for them to keep that oath
  43. ↑ Shane, Peter (November 13, 2023). "Blitzkrieg Against the Administrative State". Washington Monthly. Archived from the original on November 20, 2023. Retrieved December 1, 2023.
  44. ↑ DeVega, Chauncey (September 7, 2023). "Trump plans to become a dictator: It's time to get real about Project 2025". Salon.com. Archived from the original on September 10, 2023. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  45. ↑ Ackerman, Spencer (August 3, 2023). "This Is How Trump Becomes a Dictator". The Nation. ISSN 0027-8378. Archived from the original on September 7, 2023. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  46. ↑ Nichols, Tom (November 6, 2023). "Trump Plots Against His Enemies". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on November 8, 2023. Retrieved November 8, 2023.
  47. ↑ Corn, David. "How right-wing groups are plotting to implement Trump's authoritarianism". Mother Jones. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved September 21, 2023.
  48. ↑ Graves-Fitzsimmons, Guthrie (September 8, 2023). "The right's Project 2025 wants to make faith the government's job". MSNBC. Archived from the original on September 9, 2023. Retrieved September 9, 2023.
  49. ↑ Tannehill, Brynn (August 14, 2023). "The GOP Has a Master Plan to Criminalize Being Trans". damemagazine.com. Dame Media LLC. Archived from the original on September 8, 2023. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  50. ↑ Hansford, Amelia (September 8, 2023). "Republican presidential Project 2025 plans to define trans people as 'pornographic'". thepinknews.com. PinkNews. Archived from the original on September 10, 2023. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  51. ↑ Owen, Greg (September 8, 2023). "New far-right "vision board" outlaws trans people and imprisons all pornographers". lgbtqnation.com. LGBTQ Nation. Archived from the original on September 9, 2023. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.